Johns explicitly distanced himself from the idea of art as
subjective expression. He thus forms something of a counterpoint to the
expressionist tradition that Munch helped found. It is therefore
particularly interesting that Johns at a later stage became interested
in Munch's art. His first direct encounter with Munch was at an
exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art in New York in 1950, when Johns
was 20. We do not know much about what kind of impression Munch's art
left on the young Johns, but some 25 years later – from the late 1970s –
references to Munch started appearing in his work. This was a period of
important changes in Johns' art, in terms of both motifs and form. He
started including figurative elements, spatial perspective, references
to time and existential issues in his pictures. He has been inspired by
Munch's treatment of topics such as love, fear, illness and death, among
others. At the same time he was also interested in Munch's experimental
approach to art.
This exhibition aims to show that Munch
has had a far greater influence on Johns than was previously known. The
exhibition consists of about 130 works – paintings, prints, drawings and
photographs. An important factor is the way Munch's late self-portrait
Between the Clock and the Bed
(1940–1942) is linked to Johns' series of abstract cross-hatch works
that became something of a signature motif for him in the 1970s. The
similarity between Johns' cross-hatch pattern and the pattern on the
bedspread in Munch's self-portrait was not originally intended. However,
from 1980–1984 Johns chose to use this similarity explicitly in a
series of paintings with the same title as Munch's painting:
Between the Clock and the Bed by Jasper Johns - Virginia Museum of Fine Arts
Jasper Johns
Between the Clock and the Bed, 1980 and 1988
Ink and watercolor on plastic
Sight: 13-1/4 x 22-1/2 inches. Sheet: 18-1/4 x 26-1/4 inches
Another
part of the exhibition focuses on how Johns has been inspired by
another of Munch's self-portraits,
Self Portrait with Skeleton Arm, 1895
a lithograph in which Munch places a
skeleton arm under his own portrait, as an emblem of death.
Johns was
also interested in Munch's suggestive use of shadow and the human
figure. This is particularly noticeable in a series of paintings from
the second half of the 1980s where Johns introduces the human figure as a
subject in his pictures for the first time. This reflects a new
existential element in his art.
Munch’s
Self-Portrait between the Clock and the Bed,
1940-43, from a friend who had noticed similarities between the
bedspread in the painting and Johns’s crosshatch motif. While the
resemblance was coincidental, Johns went on to make a least 12 more
works with overt references to Munch’s art.
The Exhibition
Jasper Johns and Edvard
Munch assembles 128 works, including many important paintings, drawings,
and prints in once-in-a-lifetime combinations to trace the route Johns
traveled to find what he needed in Munch’s work. The journey was shaped
in part by chance: a quarter century after having first encountered
Munch’s art at MoMA, for instance, Johns received a postcard of
In the exhibition, for the first time in 20 years, the three monumental
Between the Clock and the Bed paintings
Johns created in the 1980s will be shown side-by-side. For the first
time ever, they will be exhibited alongside their namesake, Munch’s
Self Portrait between the Clock and the Bed, 1940-43, as well as the actual bedspread from Munch’s home that is pictured in the painting.
The
exhibition begins by exploring how Johns single-mindedly pursued
abstraction during the 1970s by creating variation after variation of
the crosshatch motif—and how crosshatching provided a starting point for
him to rediscover Munch. These early sections feature Corpse and Mirror
II, 1975-76, and the Whitney Museum exhibition print Savarin, 1977.
These works are paired with the iconic The Scream, 1895, Angst, 1896,
and The Kiss, 1902, among other works by Munch on loan from the Munch
Museum, and together show how Johns transformed a simple can filled with
brushes into a surrogate self-portrait that suggests an emerging
awareness of Munch’s experimental woodcuts and lithographs.
Johns’s
work showed a mounting tension between formalism and strong emotion in
the late 1970s, and he began to subvert abstraction by inserting overt
references to sex and death into many of his most ambitious paintings.
Major loans show the evolution of this change:
Dancers on a Plane, 1981;
both the oil and watercolor versions of Cicada, 1979; and
Tantric
Detail, 1980.
From the Munch Museum come several versions of Munch’s
haunting Madonna, and the large-scale The Dance of Life, 1925, among
other works.
Representing the moment in Johns’s career
when he abandoned the crosshatch motif altogether and returned to
recognizable imagery, In the Studio, 1982 and Perilous Night, 1982, are
juxtaposed with paintings and prints by Munch that reflect the Norwegian
artist’s anxieties about aging, illness, loss, and mortality. An
exploration of Johns’s 1982 Savarin monotypes shows how Johns used the
print medium to drill down further into motifs related to Munch,
including crosshatching, woodgrain, handprints and armprints, and even
sperm.
The last section in the exhibition proposes
several important new ideas about the Johns/Munch connection involving
shadows and ghosts. Here, all four of Johns’s Seasons paintings
(1985-86) and a large selection of Seasons drawings and prints,
including a number from Johns’s own collection, are paired with Munch’s
Self-Portrait in Hell, 1903; Starry Night, 1922-24; Self Portrait at
Quarter Past Two in the Morning, 1940-44, and numerous other
self-portrait paintings, drawings, and prints. A dozen experimental
photographs by Munch are here as well. Cumulatively, these bodies of
work suggest that Munch’s fascination with the shadow as an alter ego
capable of expressing feelings about life and death came to be shared by
Johns.
While showing how Johns used Munch’s motifs to
open up his own work to greater expressiveness, the exhibition also
demonstrates a circularity between influence, interpretation, and
appropriation. “The way that Johns internalized and processed Munch’s
images shows that Munch’s work is still evolving in how it is received
by artists and others,” says Ravenal.
“This exhibition
is a case study for the complex and unexpected ways that artists draw
inspiration from the art of the past,” says Alex Nyerges, Director of
VMFA. “It’s also a reminder that however methods and technologies
change, today, as ever, the real basis for the value of a comprehensive
art museum like VMFA is its imaginative capacity to make new connections
and expand the knowledge of the works of art in its permanent
collections.”