Thursday, January 3, 2019

Claude Monet: A Floating World



ALBERTINA Museum
 21 September 2018–6 January 2019



This autumn, the ALBERTINA Museum is mounting Austria’s first broad-based presentation of works by Claude Monet (1840–1926) in over 20 years.The 100 paintings to be shown include important loan works from over 40 international museums and private collections such as the Musée d’Orsay in Paris, the Museum of Fine Arts Boston, the National Gallery London, the National Museum of Western Art in Tokyo,and the Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts in Moscow.
This retrospective presentation, realized with generous support from the Musée Marmottan Monet in Paris, illuminates Monet’s development from realism to impressionism and onward to a mode of painting in which colors and light gradually separate from the subjects that reflect them, with the motif as such breaking free from the mere observation of nature.As a consequence, the artist’s late works would come to pave the way for abstract expressionism in painting.

Monet, the “Master of Light”

“A panorama of water and water lilies, of light and sky,” the collector René Gimpel noted in his diary on August 19, 1910 after paying a visit together with the art dealer Georges Bernheim to Claude Monet in Giverny, where he saw “a dozen canvases placed one after another in a circle on the ground, all about six feet wide by four feet high.”

This rencontre with Claude Monet took place in a high-ceilinged studio filled with light and air, which the painter had built on his property in Giverny to work on his ideas for the so-called Grandes Décorations, which he later donated to the French state. What Gimpel saw were smaller, easily movable canvases, which were preliminary works for this endeavor. Monet, who originally planned a circular installation of his water lily pond paintings in the Hotel Biron in Paris,had arranged them accordingly. His plan was abandoned after 1920, however, in favor of a realization in two oval rooms of the Orangerie.

 Claude Monet | The Water Lily Pond, 1917-1919 | © The Albertina Museum, Vienna. The Batliner Collection
Claude Monet | The Water Lily Pond, 1917-1919 | © The Albertina Museum, Vienna. The Batliner Collection 

The painting from the Batliner Collection in the ALBERTINA Museum, The Water-Lily Pond, is one of these preparatory works, some of which were sold during Monet’s lifetime. 

After the death of Michel Monet, the son and sole heirof Claude Monet, the Académie des Beaux-Arts in Paris acquired the Impressionist’s estate.Nearly ninety paintings, many of which Claude Monet had guarded with utmost care, were to find a new home—as Michel Monet stipulated in his last will—“in the Musée Marmottan [as] the largest and most beautiful Monet collection.” 

It is therefore fortunate that the ALBERTINA Museum has found a partner in the Musée Marmottan Monet, which has provided forty of its most splendid paintings by Monet for this exhibition. For a short time, the ALBERTINA Museum’s Water-Lily Pond finds itself in the midst of those paintings, in the context of which it was created at the time. 

With two other works from the Batliner Collection, which Monet painted inVétheuil and Giverny, as well as over fifty paintings on loan from about forty international institutions and works from private collections, the exhibition traces the life and work of Claude Monet with paintings that are both lavish and colorful, and yet at times also astonishingly chromatically reserved.

Precious international loans

Image result


Claude Monet
Young Girls in a Rowing Boat, 1887
Oil on canvas
The National Museum of Western Art, Tokyo, Matsukata Collection
© The National Museum of Western Art, Tokyo

The motif for this exhibition’s poster is the monumental work On the Boat, which Monet painted on the water in 1887; it is being shown courtesy of the National Museum of Western Art in Tokyo. 

 


Claude Monet
The Boulevard des Capucines, 1873
Oil on canvas
The Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow
© Photo Scala, Florence 2017
Moscow’s Pushkin Museum is contributing one of the two versions of the Boulevard des Capucines (1873), a strongly elevated view of Paris’s busiest commercial area that lets one take in the big city’s swarming, scintillating, motion-filled atmosphere. (The other is in the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art in Kansas City)

As with the nature in Monet’s landscapes, this street is a place of constant activity that changes according to the time of day, the atmosphere, and the weather.

File:Poss 1288 Grainstack in Sunshine, 1891, Meule au soleil, Oil on Canvas, 60 x 100 cm, Zurich, Kunsthaus Zurich.jpg

Claude Monet
Grainstack in the Sunlight, 1891
Oil on canvas
Kunsthaus Zürich, acquired from the Otto Meister Bequest, with a contribution from the Schweizerische Kreditanstalt
© Kunsthaus Zürich

Among the impressive loan works, many of which are in large formats, there is also the Grainstack in Sunlight (1891, on loan from Kunsthaus Zürich), which Kandinsky saw in an exhibition on French impressionism and greatly admired. Despite his enthusiasm, however, Kandinsky had difficulty recognizing the motif—an effect that presaged Monet’s emancipation of colors and the advent of abstract painting.

 Image result

Claude Monet
The Red Kerchief, Portrait of Mrs. Monet, 1873
Oil on canvas
The Cleveland Museum of Art, Estate of Leonard C. Hanna, Jr.
© The Cleveland Museum of Art


Further highlights are Monet’s early winter paintings, including the portrait The Red Kerchief (1873, Cleveland Museum of Art, Ohio, USA); two paintings of Rouen Cathedral from an extensive series that he created before this Gothic national monument that would themselves become icons of impressionism; and several paintings of the river Creuse in the Massif Central region done in very nasty weather that are pioneering in terms of their composition and use of color.

And from near the end of Monet’s life, by which point his eyesight was severely impaired and he limited himself to working in his garden at Giverny, this exhibition presents

https://uploads0.wikiart.org/images/claude-monet/the-japanese-bridge-1924.jpg!HalfHD.jpg

 The Japanese Bridge (1918–1924) 

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0d/Claude_Monet_-_House_among_the_Roses%2C_the_%281925%29.jpg/793px-Claude_Monet_-_House_among_the_Roses%2C_the_%281925%29.jpg

and his The House Among the Roses. 

Water as a source of inspiration“A Floating World” is the evocative subtitle of the exhibition in the ALBERTINA Museum, the artist’s first large-scale retrospective in Vienna in more than twenty years. The Seine was a home to the pleinairist—both in terms of his various residences and his studio boat, from which he sought to capture the nature and life of the river and its shores with his paintbrush, regardless of the weather conditions.

Guided by one hundred paintings, the exhibition visitor follows in the footsteps of the most important Impressionist along the Seine, pausing at various stations of his life: in Paris, where Monet captured the pulse of modern life with flickering light; in Argenteuil, where he reconciled nature and technology; in Vétheuil, where, in the face of his precarious financial and family situation, he withdrew into solitude to devote himself to unspoiled and original nature; and finally in Giverny, where he arrived at a new aesthetic concept that led Impressionism out of its crisis and paved the way for modern painting.

The river also stands for the many aspects that characterize Monet’s oeuvre: the flowing world of the Japanese woodblock prints that influenced Monet; the coalescing of water, mist, fog, snow, and ice; the colors that change with the weather and lighting conditions; the reflections on the water surface. 

The visitor also accompanies Monet to the coasts of Normandy and Brittany, to London and Norway, either to understand his beginnings in Le Havre and his repeated visits to the Atlantic coast, or to visit places together with the artist which promised him new inspiration for his painting. 

Wall Texts 

Claude Monet was fifty years old when he finally had his first successes. Yet for his friends he had always been the uncontested leader of “Impressionism,” the movement that self-confidently staged its secession from the official Salon under its derisive nickname. 

Even before the outbreak of World War I, Monet would become a living legend celebrated as a giant.Monet’s enduring popularity is due to the fact that his painting can be considered the last generally comprehensible form of expression in the visual arts. Given its apparent self-evidence, it is easily overlooked how it changed the visual habits of generations. Bringing light to the canvas, Monet radically rejected academic painting: his random views, sketchy brushwork, and depictions of fleeting moments contradicted the idea of an accomplished and finished painting.

Monet did not find his motifs in the past, but in the immediate present. A witness of his time, he captured the hustle and bustle of modern boulevards and the humble charm of Parisian suburbs, with their smokestacks, bridges, and leisurely Sundays on the banks of the Seine. The greatest plein-air painter of all time committed the changing light to canvas outdoors instead ofthe confinement of his studio.In this retrospective, a hundred paintings trace Monet’s development: from his beginnings in Paris to his stay in Argenteuil and the years in bitter poverty in Vétheuil, where he painted some of the most superb winter and spring landscapes. 

This was followed by a period of triumph, the series of the 1890s: the haystacks, Rouen Cathedral, and the Creuse landscapes as the first series Monet painted from a single viewpoint in changing light conditions. For the last thirty years of his life, Monet directed his gaze from close up at the opulent nature of his garden in Giverny: the water lily pond, the Japanese bridge, and the alley of roses. 

Argenteuil: 1871 to 1878

As the Franco-Prussian War of 1870/71 marks a turning point—the transitionfrom monarchy to Third Republic—in French history, these years also led to profound changes in Monet’s personal life: before the outbreak of the war, he married Camille, his companion of many years and mother of his son; seeking to escape military service, the painter fled to London with his young family, where he was inspired by the art of James Abbott McNeill Whistler and John Constable and the late work of William Turner. 

In London, Monet met Paul Durand-Ruel, his most important art dealer and supporter for many decades to come. In those years, Monet received the inheritance from his recently deceased father and from his wealthy aunt, which ensured his independence. After his return from London, Monet also met the department store magnate Ernest Hoschedé, an influential patron. Monet settled in Argenteuil, a few kilometers outside Paris, where he continued to have a studio.During this period Monet became a keen observer of the shift from the metropolis to the countryside, the changes brought about by industrialization, and railroad traffic and its infrastructure of stations and bridges. 

Besides painting intimate genre portraits of of his wife Camille, Monet carried his new landscape interpretation to a first high point. It was also during his years in Argenteuil that the first exhibition of the plein-air painters of modern life took place, who, from 1874 on, were ridiculed as “Impressionists.”

Monet’s pictures of those years show boats on the Seine; a steam engine pulling into the station in deep winter;a fragile bridge construction the artist painted from his studio boat (his own design) in the middle of the Seine; pictures of winter in which he has captured the different temperatures—from biting cold to thaw—in the subtlest nuances. In Argenteuil Monet also adopted the achievement of a flat pictorial layout from the Japanese woodblock prints that were traded on the Paris art market in large quantities.

Argenteuil: The Cradle of Impressionism

In 1871 Monet returned to France from his London exile via Holland and settled in Argenteuil. Whether it was the Zaan in Holland or the Seine in France: the river increasingly became the focus of his attention. Situated on the Seine not far from Paris, Argenteuil was surrounded by asparagus fields and vineyards; industrial plants alternated with embankment promenades; both a railroad bridge and a road bridge crossed the river. The water reflected the smoke of factory chimneys fuming in the distance, the bridges, and a boat hire. 

In Monet’s pictures, the strokes describing this mirror image began to develop a life of their own, partly detaching themselves from the concrete motif; the blurring reflections permitted Monet to carry his sketch-like manner of painting further. Moreover, Monet’s garden became increasingly important for him. When moving again in the future, he would always insist on having a garden. Whereas in Argenteuil his garden still existed independently of his painting, Monet would later lay out his garden in Giverny with his painting in mind, subordinating the design of the garden to his art.

Vétheuil: 1878 to 1881

In January 1878 Monet was forced to leave Argenteuil because of a heavy burden of debt. He had to exchange the Parisian suburb, which could easily be reached by train, for the remote village of Vétheuil. As Monet’s patron Ernest Hoschedé had gone bankrupt with his business, he could no longer support the artist, who was still eyed with suspicion because of his renewal of landscape painting. In March, Monet’s wife Camille gave birth to their second son. Alice, Ernest Hoschedé’s wife, did not follow her ruined husband to Paris, but moved to Vétheuil with her six children, where they shared a house with the Monets. Camille, who was seriously ill, died the following year.

The pictures of the snow-covered Vétheuil and the disastrous ice break of the winter of 1878/79 emanate the deep melancholy and sadness of a life marked by failure and personal misery. Only the spring and summer pictures Monet painted in Vétheuil during those years of great poverty do not betray the unlucky personal fate of the painter, whom his friends already regarded as the Impressionists’ uncontested leader. Monet was too much of an eye for the oppressing situation to obscure his unerring vision of nature. 

In 1883 Claude Monet rented a house in Giverny and moved there with Alice Hoschedé and their eight children. Following a period of extensive travels and his first major successes with his series of the Creuse and Rouen Cathedral, the artist was finally able to purchase the small house, a former cider press, in 1890. 

After Ernest Hoschedé’s death in March 1891, Monet and Alice married the subsequent year.

The Spectacle of Nature –Journeys of the 1880s

In the 1880s, Monet extended his travels to the whole of France, painting the spectacular coasts of Normandy, the Mediterranean, and Brittany. If Monet had hitherto avoided using famous landmarks as pictorial motifs, in Étretat he began to paint one of the most stunning natural monuments in France: the solitary rock needle and rock gate of Aval, which Jean-Baptiste Camille Corot and Gustave Courbet had immortalized before him. 

As in Vétheuil and Argenteuil, Monet was interested in the changing appearance of his motifs, caused by different weather conditions, the times of day, and the seasons. He studied the stages of the sunset, with the distant coast increasingly curling into a dark block set against the light. With loose brushstrokes he sought to arrest the individual moment that was so difficult to grasp aesthetically.

Whereas in the following decade Monet would approach the motifs of his famous series—the façade of Rouen Cathedral, the grainstacks, the Houses of Parliament in London, and the hills above the Creuse—from a single perspective and observe how they perpetually changed in the light and atmosphere, on the Normandy coast he still studied his motifs from different viewpoints, both from the distance and from close up. Monet still orbited around his motif, paintingit from various perspectives.

Impression and Completion—The Scandal of Impressionism 

The green tone of deep water, the purple glow of wet sand, the dance of thousands of lights as the sun slowly sinks into the sea—nothing escaped Monet’s eye. It also observed how the bright morning light softens the contrasts between colors and bathes the coast in an even light.While working on the French coast, Monet, resorting to the concepts of sprezzatura and non-finito, gave the swiftly painted sketch an autonomy of its own, so that the line between sketch and finished painting became increasingly blurred. 

Monet’s art dealer Durand-Ruel disliked overly sketchy paintings, which he considered unsalable. On the other hand, the artist protested that the paintings he delivered were finished all the same.The scandal about Impressionism was closely linked to the reproach of producing unfinished work. Although the oil sketch as an independent art discipline has long found its devotees, in the case of Monet the scandal had to do with his claim that what resembled a preliminary sketchiness actually represented the final work of art. For Monet, the swiftness of painting was in fact proof of the truthfulness with which a momentary mood and atmosphere were captured with due spontaneity and immediacy.

The Valley of the Creuse

In 1889 Monet traveled to Fresselines for the first time in the company of friends. Located on the plateau above the confluence of the headwaters of the Creuse, the commune was enclosed by a gloomy and melancholy landscape. Here it was for the first time that Monet did not paint a series of pictures representing a sequence of various views of the same place: he gave up the depiction of a single motif viewed from different spatial perspectives in favor of the depiction of the same motif viewed at different times. This and the subsequent series—of poplars, grain stacks, and Rouen Cathedral—are almost necessarily deserted: the observation of a motif at different times required steady surroundings. In these pictures the lapse of time and change are brought about without the painter moving back and forth while the light and the colors alter.

Monet painted the Valley of the Creuse in the morning, at noon, in damp and cold weather, in bright sunlight, and at dusk. The differences in the landscape—and later in the façade of Rouen Cathedral—manifested themselves in ever-smaller time units, so that Monet frequently worked at three to four canvases simultaneously in order to be able to respond to changes in the position of the sun and in the atmosphere.

The Late Work at Giverny

In 1883, Monet moved to Giverny, a small town on the Seine 70 kilometers west of Paris. He rented an old cider press and orchard, where he lived with his companion Alice and the children. Crowned by long-overdue success, the artist was finally able to purchase the estate in 1890. Here he completed two gigantic panoramas of the gardens of Giverny, which were already a great attraction during his lifetime: the legendary Grandes Décorations, which he would eventually donate to the French state after the end of World War I. 

It appears that neither political events, such as the corruption scandal accompanying the construction of the Panama Canal (1892) or the state crisis triggered by the Dreyfus affair (from 1894 onward), nor personal blows of fate left any traces in Monet’s art: around the turn of the century, Monet’s stepdaughter, his second wife Alice, and his son Jean died within a few years. As if Monet were only working for himself, he devoted himself to the blaze of color in his private refuge with astonishing exclusiveness. 

Whereas the young painter had roamed the countryside in all kinds of weather to render his motifs from different perspectives, in the 1890s Monet, now in his fifties, painted his famous series: variations of a motif he depicted from a single viewpoint and under changing conditions of light and weather. 

In his old age at Giverny, Monet finally devoted himself exclusively to his opulent flower garden and the alley of roses, the exotic willows, the Japanese bridge, the wisterias, and the water lily pond. In his late work, which was revolutionary in terms of theme, composition, and painting technique, Monet was solely guided by his inner sensations—an approach helped by his diminishing eyesight due to a cataract. The interpretation of the alley of roses and the Japanese bridge as a tunnel from which there was no escape expressed the more-than-eighty-year-old painter’s wish to completely withdraw from the outside world, his melancholy reading of nature reflecting a life drawing to a close. Nevertheless, Monet’s dark epilogue gave another fresh turn to his painting, whose radical modernism would only bear fruit decades after the death of this great master of plein-air painting.

Monet, Creator and Painter of His Garden

More than eighty years old, Monet was almost blind when he painted the series of the alley of roses. Similar to Beethoven, who was forced to exclusively rely on his inner ear as his hearing deteriorated, Monet had to resort to his experience when inventing a new, albeit clouded, imagery for the very last time. No longer was he able to perceive nature’s rich chromatic spectrum and his own colorful palette.When it became hot under the glass roof of his studio in the summer, Monet painted the Japanese bridge and the alley of roses in the garden, where it was cool. The wooden bridge and the iron trellises shared the tall arch that gave these pictures their basic structure on which tendrils metamorphosed into sprawling lines of color. Monet took the flowers up into the air to have them float there weightlessly. He was interested in the “dematerialization of flowers and plants.”

Biography 

Claude Monet is born in Paris in 1840. He spends his youth in Le Havre. After two years he is exempted from a seven-year period of military service in Algeria through payment for a substitute. Monet receives allowances from his family until his father’s death in 1871. During his studies in Parisian studios he meets his future friends Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Alfred Sisley, and Frédéric Bazille.

In 1867 Camille Doncieux, Monet’s lover and model, gives birth to their son Jean. The couple marries in 1870. In order to escape army service during the Franco-Prussian War, Monet flees to London in 1870. He is fascinated by the haze, smoke, and fog in the city on the Thames and studies the art of John Constable and William Turner.

In 1871 he returns to France via the Netherlands and for a period of seven years settles in Argenteuil, a Parisian suburb on the Seine: Argenteuil becomes the cradle of Impressionism, and Monet is regarded as the “Impressionists’” uncrowned leader. The painter and his friends receive this derisive nickname in 1874 on the occasion of their first group exhibition because of the sketchiness of their atmospheric manner of painting.

In 1878 Monet is forced to leave Argenteuil for Vétheuil, a remote village on the Seine, because of a huge burden of debt. That same year Camille gives birth to their second son, Michel. She dies in 1879 after a serious illness. 

After her husband has gone bankrupt, Alice Hoschedé, the wife of Monet’s former patron, and her six children move in with Monet. It is only after the death of Alice’s husband that she and Monet legalize their relationship through marriage in 1892. In this difficult phase of his life, the artist paints not only melancholy pictures of the snow-covered Vétheuil and the disastrous ice breakup of 1880, but also sunny spring landscapes. 

Having accumulated more and more debts, Monet also has to leave Vétheuil. In 1883 he rents a small cider press in Giverny, which he is able to purchase in 1890.

In the 1890s Monet paints his famous series, which finally earn him success and fame: the Creuse landscapes, the haystacks, and Rouen cathedral.

However, his real passion lies in painting his garden in Giverny, which he gradually enlarges. These pictures reveal nothing of the painter’s personal blows of fate: the deaths of his stepdaughter in 1899, his second wife in 1911, and his first son in 1914. Neither does Monet’s withdrawn late work reflect the French state’s serious crises, not even World War I. The artist has long been considered a living legend and one of France’s national monuments. 

With his vision heavily impaired through a cataract, Monet bathes his pictures in the colors of late autumn during his final years. These gloomy and almost abstract paintings only become known after Monet’s death in 1926.
Your chosen press images are now ready for download under the following link:

https://www.albertina.at/en/press/?token=amRrQHF1ZXVlaW5jLmNvbXwxNTQyMDc0MTUx


Image result
Claude Monet
On the Beach at Trouville, 1870
Oil on canvas
Museé Marmottan Monet, Paris
© Musée Marmottan Monet, Paris / Bridgeman Images

File:Claude Monet - Train in the Snow.jpg

Claude Monet
Train Engine in the Snow, 1875
Oil on canvas
Musée Marmottan Monet, Paris
© Musée Marmottan Monet, Paris / Bridgeman Images

Image result

Claude Monet
Water Lilies, 1907
Oil on canvas
Musée Marmottan Monet, Paris
© Musée Marmottan Monet, Paris / Bridgeman Images

Image result

Claude Monet
The Studio Boat, 1874
Oil on canvas
Collection Kröller-Müller Museum, Otterlo
© Kröller-Müller Museum, Otterlo

Image result

Claude Monet
Rouen Cathedral, Sunlight Effect, 1894
Oil on canvas
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Juliana Cheney Edwards Collection
© Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

 Image result

Claude Monet
The Landing Stage, 1871
Oil on canvas
Acquavella Galleries
© Acquavella Galleries

Image result


Claude Monet
Camille Monet and a Child in the Garden, 1875
Oil on canvas
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, anonymous gift in memory of Mr. and Mrs. Edwin S. Webster
© Museum of Fine Arts, Boston




Image result

Claude Monet
Water Lilies, 1908
Oil on canvas
Callimanopulos Collection
© Callimanopulos Collection, photo: Ugo Bozzi Editore Srl, Rome

Image result

Claude Monet
Water Lilies, 1916-1919
Oil on canvas
Fondation Beyeler, Riehen/Basel, Sammlung Beyeler
© Fondation Beyeler, Riehen/Basel Sammlung Beyeler; Photo: Robert Bayer

Image result

Claude Monet
The Church at Vétheuil, Snow, 1878/1879
Oil on canvas
Musée d'Orsay, Paris
© RMN-Grand Palais/Musée d’Orsay/Stéphane Maréchalle

Image result

Claude Monet
Lane in the Poppy Field, Île Saint-Martin, 1880
Oil on canvas
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Estate of Julia W. Emmons
© The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Claude Oscar Monet - Breakup of Ice Grey Weather 1880

Claude Monet
Breakup of Ice, Gray Weather, 1880
Oil on canvas
Calouste Gulbenkian Museum, Lisbon – Founder’s Collection
© Calouste Gulbenkian Museum, Catarina Gomes Ferreira

https://uploads8.wikiart.org/images/claude-monet/the-rock-needle-seen-through-the-porte-d-aval-1886.jpg!HalfHD.jpg

Claude Monet
The Rock Needle Seen through the Porte d’Aval, 1886
Oil on canvas
National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa; gift from the Marjorie and Gerald Bronfman Collection, Montréal
© National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa

Wednesday, January 2, 2019

American Moderns in Watercolor: Edward Hopper and His Contemporaries

    Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art

    December 22, 2018 to March 17, 2019 

    The Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art, in Hartford, Conn., will present American Moderns in Watercolor: Edward Hopper and His Contemporaries December 22, 2018 to March 17, 2019.  

    American Moderns in Watercolor brings together sixteen works of art from the 1920s and 1930s that depict urban and rural subjects. Edward Hopper and contemporaries such as Charles Burchfield, Stuart Davis, Preston Dickinson, Arthur Dove, John Marin, and Abraham Walkowitz were increasingly on the move, either by car or on foot, observing the changing American landscape. This exhibition explores how these modern artists uniquely embraced the portable medium of watercolor, experimenting with new subjects, styles, and techniques.


    Image result
    Stuart Davis, Gas Pumps ( 1935, Opaque watercolor, with pen and black ink, on illustration board, Gift of Henry E. Schnakenberg, 1952.388. © 2018 Estate of Stuart Davis / Licensed by VAGA at Artists Rights Society (ARS), NY; 

    From the solitude in Hopper's composed watercolors of coastal New England to the energetic forces of New York City painted by Marin, American Moderns in Watercolor shows how artists drew inspiration from their surroundings. "Bringing renewed interest and aspirations for the medium, these artists elevated watercolor to new levels," said Erin Monroe, Robert H. Schutz Jr., Associate Curator of American Paintings and Sculpture, "and contributed to the development of modern art in this country."

    The Wadsworth Atheneum was at the forefront of collecting and exhibiting modern American watercolors, especially the work of Edward Hopper.






     Edward Hopper (United States, 1882-1967), Captain Strout's House, Portland Head, 1927, watercolor on paper, 14 x 20 inches. Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art, The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund.)



     Edward Hopper Rockland Harbor, 1926, watercolor on paper, 13 7/8 x 20 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1928.324. 
     

     Edward Hopper Custom House, Portland, 1927, watercolor on paper, 14 x 20 inches. Gift of Robert W. Huntingon, 1946.232. 
     

     Edward Hopper Methodist Church, Provincetown, 1930, watercolor on paper, 25 x 19 3/4 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1951.19.

    In 1928, the museum purchased the first of six watercolors by Hopper (four are included in the exhibition) and gave Hopper his first solo museum exhibition later that year.



     Edward Hopper, Marshall's House, 1932, Opaque and transparent watercolor over graphite on wove paper, Purchased through the gift of Henry and Walter Keney, 1933.93. © 2018 Heirs of Josephine Hopper / Licensed by Artists Rights Society (ARS), NY.


    Another important early acquisition was Marshall's House, in 1933, depicting Hopper's neighbor's house on Cape Cod. A recent documentary, "Edward Hopper and Marshall's House," will be on view in the exhibition.


     Image result
    John Marin, From the Bridge, N.Y.C. (detail), 1933, Opaque and transparent watercolor with charcoal and collage on wove paper, The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1948.479. © 2018 Estate of John Marin / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.

















     John Marin (United States, 1870-1953), Big Wood Island, 1914, opaque and transparent watercolor over graphite drawing on ivory paper, 14 1/4 x 16 3/8 inches. Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art, The Schnakenberg Fund. 1951.275.)



    The exhibition begins with sections on the Ashcan school, including works by John Sloan and William Glackens, and then traces the emergence of American modernism with works by John Marin, Georgia O'Keeffe, Stuart Davis, Arthur Dove, and Edward Hopper, where there is tremendous depth in the collection.

    The Atheneum's collection also includes Social realism, represented by Reginald Marsh and Ben Shahn; Regionalism by Thomas Hart Benton and Jacob Lawrence.
    This is the first of two presentations from the Wadsworth's outstanding collection of American works on paper.

    The second exhibition will highlight Modernist still lifes by artists such as Charles Demuth, Arthur Dove, and Georgia O'Keeffe, and opens March 23, 2019.

    The exhibition concludes with strong examples of postwar realism and abstraction as seen in works by Ellsworth Kelly and Andrew Wyeth.


    Exhibition Checklist

    All work from the Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art unless otherwise noted.
     
      Image result
     
    Thomas Hart Benton (United States 1889-1975)
     
    Oil Barge, circa 1940, graphite, pen & ink, sepia wash on tan wove paper, 13 3/4 x 16 1/2 inches. Gift of Esso Standard Oil Company, 1951.231.
     



     
    Charles Burchfield (United States 1893-1967)
     
    Looking through a Bridge, 1938, translucent and opaque watercolor on paper mounted to heavy board, 22 5/8 x 33 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1939.208. 
     
    Spring Evening [Salem], 1917, translucent and opaque watercolor, graphite on paper, mounted to heavy board, 20 x 13 7/8 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1940.27. 
     
    Song in the Rain, 1947, translucent and opaque watercolor on paper, mounted to heavy board, 40 3/8 x 28 1/4 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1957.16. 
     
    November Landscape, 1946, translucent and opaque watercolor on paper, mounted to heavy board, 33 7/8 x 26 inches. Gift of Priscilla Cunningham, 1991.42. 
     
    Nature's Mystic Spiral, 1916, opaque and transparent watercolor with graphite on cream wove paper, 11 1/4 x 8 1/4 inches. Bequest of Edward Gorey, 2001.13.32. 
     
    Study of Bats in Flight, circa 1954­1963, black crayon on cream wove paper, 13 3/4 x 19 1/2 inches. Bequest of Edward Gorey, 2001.13.34.
     
     
     
    Stuart Davis (United States 1894-1964)
     
    Gas Pumps, 1935, gouache, graphite, pen & ink on illustration board, 16 5/6 x 15 inches. Gift of Henry E. Schnakenberg, 1952.388. 
     
    Yellow Hand Truck, 1939, opaque watercolor, graphite on paper, 11 15/16 x 15 7/8 inches. Gift of Mrs. James Laughlin, 1981.61.
     
     
     
    Charles Demuth (United States, 1883-1935)
     
    Eight O'Clock (Evening), 1917, watercolor wash and graphite on cream, light weight laid paper, 8 x 10 3/8 inches. Gift of James L. Goodwin and Henry Sage Goodwin from the Estate of Philip L. Goodwin, 1951.261. 
     
    Eight O'Clock ((Morning), 1917, watercolor wash over graphite drawing on cream colored wove paper, 7 7/8 x 10 3/16 inches. Gift of George J. Dyer, 1958.228.
     
    Still Life with Eggplant and Summer Squash, circa 1927, opaque and transparent watercolor over graphite drawing on wove paper, 13 1/2 x 19 3/4 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1928.40. 
     
    Jonquils, 1928, opaque and transparent watercolor over graphite drawing on tan paper, 17 5/8 x 11 3/4 inches. Gift of George J. Dyer, 1958.179.\
     
     
     
    Preston Dickinson (United States, 1891-1930)
     
    Still Life with Knife, 1924, oil and oil wash over graphite on cream, light weight wove paper, 8 1/2 x 11 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1959.228.
     
     

    Preston Dickinson, Power Station – Night, 1924, Pastel and graphite heightened with opaque watercolor on laid paper. Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art, Hartford, CT: Purchased through the gift of Henry and Walter Keney (1928.323).
     
    Power Station - Night, 1924, unfixed pastel, graphite, and opaque watercolor highlights on cream laid paper, 25 x 18 1/2 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1928.323.
     
     
     
    Arthur Dove (United States 1880-1946)
     
    Flour Mill II, 1938, black ink and transparent watercolor on ivory wove watercolor paper, 9 x 7 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1955.264. 
     
    Sunrise, 1937, opaque and transparent watercolor, pen and ink on ivory wove watercolor paper, 5 x 7 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1955.265. 
     
     
     
    Guy Pene du Bois (United States 1884-1958)
     
    Roosevelt!, 1938, transparent watercolor, pen & ink on cream paper, 14 11/16 x 11 15/16 inches. Gift of George J. Dyer, 1963.500.
     
     
     
    William Glackens (United States, 1870-1938)
     
    [East Side] or Far from the Fresh Air Farm (study), circa 1911, charcoal with blue and red crayon on light  brown wove paper, 24 1/4 x 16 1/2 inches. Gift of Henry E. Schnakenberg, 1954.121.
     
     
     
    Arshile Gorky (United States, 1904-1948)
     
    Untitled, 1943, graphite over colored crayon on ivory wove paper, 27 3/4 x 19 3/4 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1955.275.
     
     
     
    Morris Graves (United States 1910-2001)
     
    The Myth of Division and Separation, 1940, opaue and transparent watercolor, possibly sumi ink, on Chinese paper, 23 x 20 3/4 inches. Gift of Henry E. Schnakenberg, 1952.298.
     
     
     
    George Overbury "Pop" Hart (United States, 1868-1933)
     
    Street Fair: Fort Lee Special, 1930 or 31, translucent watercolor, crayon on paper, 18 x 35 1/2 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1947.401.
     

     
    Rockwell Kent (United States 1882-1971)
     
    Illustration for Moby Dick, chapter CXXXV, circa 1929, pen and ink on paper, 10 x 7 inches. Gift of E. Weyhe, 1955.398.   
     
    Illustration for Moby Dick, circa 1929, pen and ink on paper, 10 x 7 inches. Gift of E. Weyhe, 1955.399.
     
     
     
    Yasuo Kuniyoshi (United States, born Japan, 1889-1953)
     
    Grapes in White Bowl, 1923, pen and ink, brush and ink, colored ink, and graphite on paper, 22 x 15 1/2 inches. Gift of William E. Hill, 1959.16.  
     
    Wild Flowers, 1922, pen and ink, ink and wash on paper, 17 5/8 x 12 inches. Gift of William E. Hill, 1959.17.
     
     
     
    Jacob Lawrence (United States, 1917­2000)
     
    Rain, 1937, opaque watercolor heightened with graphite on paper, 28 x 20 3/4 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1990.30.
     
     
     
     
     
    John Marin (United States, 1870-1953)
     
    Downtown New York, 1913, graphite on heavy tracing paper with canvas texture, 10 x 8 1/4 inches. Purchased through the gift of Henry and Walter Keney, 1960.226.  
     
    Big Wood Island, 1914, opaque and transparent watercolor over graphite drawing on ivory paper, 14 1/4 x 16 3/8 in ches. The Schnakenberg Fund. 1951.275. 
     
    Movement No.3, Related to Downtown New York Series, 1926, opaque & transparent wc over charcoal drawing on ivory wove paper, 17 1/2 x 22 3/8 inches. Gift of James L. Goodwin and Henry Sage Goodwin from the Estate of Philip L. Goodwin, 1958.229. 
     
    From the Bridge, N.Y.C., 1933, opaque and transparent wc and charcoal, collage pieces on ivory paper 21 7/8 x 26 3/4 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1948.479. 
     
    Green Sea, Cape Split, Maine, 1941, opaque and transparent watercolor, graphite drawing on ivory paper, 15 1/2 x 22 1/2 inches. Bequest of Arthur P. Day, 1952.405.
     
     
     
    Reginald Marsh (United States, 1898-1954)
     
    New York, 1938, opaque and transparent watercolor over graphite drawing on ivory paper 19 1/2 x 13 1/2 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1939.209.

     
    Woman Walking, 1944, watercolor wash over faint chalk drawing on ivory paper, 19 1/2 x 13 1/4 inches. Gift of Mr. and Mrs. William Benton, 1961.158.
     
     
     
     
    Georgia O'Keeffe (United States, 1887-1986)
     
    Slightly Open Clam Shell, 1926, pastel on white ground on pressed artist's board, 18 1/2 x 13 inches. The Douglas Tracy Smith and Dorothy Potter Smith Fund, 2009.1.1.
     
      Image result
     
     
    Joseph Pennell (United States, 1866-1926)
     
    Building New York, circa 1920, transparent and opaque watercolor heightened with black chalk on buff paper, 11 3/4 x 8 3/4 inches. Gift of Philip L. Goodwin, 1930.7.
      Image result
     
     
    Maurice Prendergast (United States, 1859-1924)
     
    The Amusement Park, circa 1902, reworked in 1915, pastel over opaque and transparent watercolor over graphite, drawing on wove paper, 18 1/4 x 15 3/4 inches. Bequest of George A. Gay, 1941.172.
     
     
     
    Ben Shahn (United States, 1898-1969)

    Image result
     
    Vacant Lot, 1939, watercolor on paper mounted to plywood, 19 x 23 inches. The Ella Gallup Sumner and Mary Catlin Sumner Collection Fund, 1941.390.
     
     
     
    Charles Sheeler (United States, 1883-1965)

    Image result
     
    The Stove, 1931, black conte crayon on wove paper, 6 7/8 x 9 3/ 8 inches. The collection of Philip L. Goodwin through James L. Goodwin and Henry Sage Goodwin, 1958.232.
     
     
     
    John Sloan (United States, 1871-1951)

     Image result
     
    Study for Hairdresser's Window, circa 1907, black crayon on cream wove paper, 6 3/4 x 5 1/8 inches. The Dorothy Clark Archibald and Thomas L. Archibald Fund, 1998.7.1. 
     
     
    Abraham Walkowtiz (United States 1880-1965)

    Image result

     
    Future New York, 1912­-1914, graphite on wove paper with canvas texture, 10 3/8 x 6 inches. Gift of Abraham Walkowitz, 1949.246.

     
     

    Master Paintings Evening Sale At Sotheby’s New York January 30



    Sotheby’s will offer works by some of the most celebrated names in  European  art  history  in  its Master  Paintings  Evening  Sale  on  30  January 2019.  Headlined  by  an  impressive  group  of  17th-century Dutch  masterpieces  from  a  distinguished  private  collection,  the  auction  also  features  standout  works  by masters including  Orazio  Gentileschi,  Pieter  Brueghel  the Younger and Ambrosius Bosschaert the Elder.   

     Open to the public on 25 January, the sale will be presented alongside Sotheby’s Masters Week exhibitions of Master Paintings & Sculpture Day Sale, Old Master Drawings, 19th-Century European Art and The Gilded Age Revisited: Property of a Distinguished American Collection.  

    MAGNIFICENT DUTCH PICTURES FROM A DISTINGUISHED PRIVATE COLLECTION

    At the core of this January’s sale is a group of seven paintings  of  impressive  quality  from  a  distinguished  private collection.

     Joachim anthonisz Wtewael, A Banquet of the Gods, signed lower left: J(?) V WÆL FECIT, oil on copper, set into an early seventeenth century oak panel, 6⅛ by 8⅛ in.; 15.5 by 20.5 cm. Estimate $5/7 million. Courtesy Sotheby's.
    Leading this group is a remarkably well-preserved Banquet of the  Gods by Joachim Anthonisz.   Wtewael.  Its   elegant   forms,   classical   subject,  and  refined  technique  exemplify  the  Dutch  Mannerist  movement,  which  included  the  most  important  artists  in  the  Netherlands  from  1580  to  1620.  Praised  by  his  contemporaries  for  his  versatility and prowess, Wtewael was capable of working across mediums on any scale, though it is his small paintings, such as the present work, that are his most prized. The fine brushstrokes and the glittering  colors  in  this  copper  exploit  the  smooth,  reflective  surface  of  the  metal  support,  and  fully  reveal  Wtewael’s  extraordinary  skill.  

     This  painting  further  shines  a  light  on  this  artist’s  imaginative  and  inventive  storytelling,  for  within  this  small  composition,  nearly  50  elegantly  posed  figures painted in a kaleidoscope of color have been cleverly assembled for a heavenly banquet set within a glade and upon an elaborate arrangement of clouds.

    Image result
    Jan van de Cappelle A   shipping scene  on a calm sea, with a number of vessels and figures, and a jetty on the left Estimate $4/6 million
    This luminous  scene  is  a  particularly  evocative  and  successful  example  of  the  calm,  expansive  3seascapes that distinguished Jan van de Cappelle as one of the leading marine painters of the Dutch Golden  Age.  Bathed  in  a  soft,  warm  light,  this  remarkably  well-preserved  large  panel,  which  likely  dates to the 1650s, radiates a mesmerizing effect that transports viewers to the peaceful waters of the Netherlandish coast.


    Image result
    Jacobus Vrel,Street Scene with Two Figures Walking Away (right) Estimate $1.5/2 million

    Image result

    Jacobus Vrel Street Scene with Figures In Conversation  Estimate $1/1.5 million

    An  enigmatic  and  mysterious master,  Jacobus Vrel  painted  quiet  street  scenes  that  speak  acrossthe  centuries in a way that  is strangely affecting.   Vrel’s works are incredibly  rare –  around  thirty  eight are known, consisting mostly of interior scenes, street views and one church interior, of which nearly half are signed while dated  examples  range  only  from  1654  to  1662.  The  artist’s painting technique –  a  straightforward  manner  without  glazes  or  other  refinements –  complements  his  unpretentious  subject  matter  and  suggests  that  he  was  quite  possibly  self-taught.  Though  many  locations  from  Friesland  to  the  Rhineland  have  been  sought  for  his  street  scenes,  they  are,  in  fact,  likely to be imaginary.

    RENAISSANCE PAINTING IN EUROPE

    Image result

    Orazio Gentileschi
    The Fall of the Rebel Angels
    Estimate $2.5/3.5 million

    Painted on a large piece of alabaster, this dynamic and dramatic Fall  of  the  Rebel  Angels  is  a  relatively  early  work  of  Orazio  Gentileschi. It  was  unknown  until  its  reappearance  in  2009,  when  it  was  quickly  recognized  by  scholars  as  an  important  addition  to  the  artist’s  corpus.  It  is  dateable  to  circa  1601/2,  at  the  moment  when  Gentileschi  begins  to  shift  away  from  his  mannerist  beginnings to a more naturalistic style, due in part to his burgeoning friendship with Caravaggio.

    http://www.sothebys.com/content/dam/stb/lots/N10/N10007/N10007-4_web.jpg

    Taddeo Gaddi Saint Anthony Abbot Estimate $800,000/1.2 million

    This  finely  rendered  gold  ground  panel  of  Saint  Anthony  Abbot  is  by  Taddeo Gaddi, Giotto’s favorite and most successful pupil. A mature work  of  high  quality  and  confidence,  it  dates  to  circa 1345-1350  and  presumably once formed part of a polyptych in the Florentine Church of Santa Maria Vergine della Croce al Tempio, along with other panels found  today  in  the  Metropolitan  Museum  of  Art  and  the  Museo  Bandini in Fiesole. In this panel, Saint Anthony Abbot (circa 251-356), a  hermit  saint  and  the  founder  of  monasticism,  is  visible  in  three-quarter length as an aged man wearing a plain monk’s cloak and cowl with remnants of his staff and its tau-shaped handle, he faces to the viewer’s left, with a downward gaze. He is expressively rendered with exquisite  detail  and  sophistication  so  as  to  wholly  capture  the  noble  simplicity that defines his character.

    Image result

    Jan Sanders van Hemessen Christ as Triumphant Redeemer Estimate $400/600,000

     This intensely striking Christ as Triumphant Redeemer is an important rediscovery  from  the  corpus  of  the  Flemish  master  Jan  Sanders  van  Hemessen. Until only recently, the picture had been nearly completely over-painted,   thus   masking   the   incredibly   well   preserved   original   composition  lying  underneath.  The  powerful  rendition  of  the  painted  figure, its monumentality  and  idiosyncratic  color  scheme,  along  with  5the  technical  prowess  of  Christ’s  portrayal  all  point  to  Hemessen’s  work  from  the  mid  1540’s,  thus  making this a mature and signifi cant picture of the High Renaissance of Flemish painting.


    DISCOVERIES & REDISCOVERIES

    Image result

    Vittore Carpaccio
    Madonna and Child
    Estimate $300/500,000

    This  charming  painting  of  the  Madonna  and  Child  by  the  great  Venetian  narrative  painter  Vittore  Carpaccio  has  been largely unseen for most of the last century, known to scholars  almost  exclusively  through  old  black  and  white  photographs.  The  painting  was  seen  firsthand  prior  to  1928, but otherwise, all art historians who have published the  painting  have  done  so  based  on  rudimentary  images.  Consequently,  the  picture  has  remained  much  discussed  in  the  literature,  and  only  with  its  reappearance  has  it  been  possible  to  assess  this  panel  as  an  autograph  workby  Carpaccio,  datable  to  the  1490s,  the  decade  during  which Carpaccio had begun to establish himself as one of the  greatest  and  most  original  painters  of  Renaissance  Venice.

    Image result

    Ambrogio Lorenzetti Saint John the Baptist Estimate $400/600,000

    This  exquisite  roundel  depicting  Saint  John  the  Baptist,  despite  being  a  recent  discovery,  is  unmistakably  the  work  of  Ambrogio  Lorenzetti,  one  of  the  most  influential painters  of  the  early  14th-century.  While  the  paintings  of  the artist’s brother, Pietro, adhered to  a  more  traditional  6style,  Ambrogio  continually  strove  for  innovation,  looking  beyond  his  native  Siena  for  inspiration.  In  the wake of Duccio di Buoninsegna, Ambrogio built upon the invention of the older artist, absorbing the   advancements   of   his  Florentine  contemporaries  in  naturalism  and  spatial  awareness  and  incorporate them into Sienese painting.

    Image result
    Paolo Veneziano Wings  of  a  triptych:  interior:  Saints  Peter,  John  the  Baptist,  Paul and a Bishop Saint; exterior: Saint Christopher and the Christ Child, and Saint Anthony Abbot Estimate $300/400,000 

    These small panels constitute a highly important discovery and addition to the oeuvre of Paolo Veneziano, the dominant artistic personality   of   14th-century   Venice,   who   was   almost   solely   responsible for the transition of Venetian art from its Byzantine roots  to  its  own  distinctive  Gothic  style.  Until  recently  over-painted,  over-gilded  and  joined  as  one  to  form  a  kind  of  icon,  these  works  have  now  been  returned  insofar  as  possible  to  their  original  appearance  as  part  of  the  wings of a portable triptych. Both sides of the panels exhibit the finesse and intensity of expression -exemplified here in Saint Christopher’s gaze towards the Christ Child - for which Paolo Veneziano is most prized, and defines him as the most important artist in Venice at this time.

    STILL LIFES

    Image result

    Pieter Claesz

    Still life of lemons and olives, pewter plates, a roemer and a façon-de-Venise wine glass on a ledge Estimate $700/900,000

    The  works  that  Pieter  Claesz  painted  between  1628  and  1630,  of  which  this  is  an  outstanding example,  came  to  define  the  classical  Haarlem  7ontbijtje (breakfast piece). Their elements are not only very limited, but also biased towards objects such  as  glassware  and  silver  plates  rather  than  foodstuffs,  and  their  purpose  is  to  balance  the  composition, rather than to represent a meal.

    Image result

    Ambrosius Bosschaert the Elder
    A Still  Life  Of Flowers  In  A  Glass  Flask  On  A  Marble  Ledge,  Flanked By A Red Admiral Butterfly And A Lizard Estimate $2.5/3.5 million

    The  sale  will  also  feature  a  magnificent  flower  painting  by  another  pioneer  in  the  genre,  Ambrosius Bosschaert the Elder.  Bosschaertwas  wholly  responsible  for  the  sudden  outburst  of  flower  painting  in   the   Netherlands   at   the   start   of   the   17th   century   and   this   beautifully  preserved  oil  on  copperis  a  very  fine  example  of  his  early  works.  Signed  and  dated  to  1607,  this work  is  little  known, having never  been  publicly  exhibited,  and  only  resurfacing  to  the  market in 1965.  

    Image result

     Luis Meléndez
    Still life with a plate of azaroles, fruit, mushrooms, cheese and receptacles Estimate $1.5/2 million

    This  outstanding  work  by  one  of  the  greatest  still-life painters  of  the  eighteenth  century,  Luis  Meléndez,  is  a  variant  of  a  picture  today  in  the  Museo  del  Prado, Madrid, that formed part of the celebrated series of some 44 still lifes commissioned by the Prince of Asturias, the future Charles IV, for his History Cabinet in the Escorial. The painting continues the richstill-life tradition  of  the  Spanish  Golden  Age  developed  by  the  likes of  Juan  Sánchez  Cotán  and  Francisco de Zurbarán, yet at the same time is imbued with a sense of modernity through the highly realistic  treatment  of  the  objects  themselves  that  reflects  the  prevailing  spirit  of   the   Age   of   Enlightenment


    HUMAN RELFECTIONS: PROPERTY FROM A DISTINGUISHED PRIVATE COLLECTIONS

    Spanning   Old Master   paintings   and   drawings,   to   Impressionist,   Modern   and   Contemporary  art,  and  exquisite  prints,  the  collection  will  be  offered  across   multiple   sales   in   London,   Paris   and   New   York   in   2019.   



    Francisco José de Goya Y Lucientes, Portrait of the actress Rita Luna. Oil on canvas, 16¾ by 13⅜ in.; 42.6 by 34.1 cm. Estimate $1/1.5 million. Courtesy Sotheby's.


     Featuring works by Italian, Spanish, and Dutch masters, the collection is  led  by  a  small  and  intimate  portrait  of  the  famous  18th-century Spanish actress, Rita Luna by Francisco José de Goya (lestimate $1/1.5 million). Dated to 1814-1818, it was discovered in a cupboard in the artist’s home by his grandson. Due to its small scale – an unusual characteristic  of  the  other  portraits  Goya  was  producing  at  the  time  –  the  portrait  is  said  to  have  been created for the artist’s own personal use.  

     Additional highlights include a rare easel-sized painting of The Annunciation by the great Lombard 17th  century  painter,  Daniele  Crespi  (estimate  $300/500,000)  and  a  devotional  picture  depicting  The  Madonna  and  Child  with  St.  John  the  Baptist  by  Genovese  artist,  Bernardo  Strozzi,  painted  circa 1620 (estimate $300/500,000).